

At least some people like to play something different then a multiplayer that has been recycled for 4 years.Two great first-person shooters: Modern Warfare 3 and Battlefield 3.
#Cod modern warfare 3 vs battlefield 3 Pc#
Like BF3 will never have 2 million players playing its game unlike call of duty.īattlefield started and was meant to be a PC game, but the series got ported to consoles. MightyMitch DeadlyDasher UnboundxSoviet -Goblin- Ding Ding, Round 1. These are some of the cheaters found on Battlefield 3, Modern Warfare 3 and Red Dead Redemption.
#Cod modern warfare 3 vs battlefield 3 software#
In just about every multiplayer game you will find someone using a modified controller, aimbot, rapid fire, glitches, and several other hardware and software hacks. You can check out GamesRadar’s David Houghton’s take on the Modern Warfare 3 vs Battlefield 3 showdown here, but which title do you prefer? Let us know in the comments below! Since the Call of Duty franchise is now considered by many to be more of a console shooter than Battlefield, the difference between player opinion and actual playtime in the recent Raptr report seems to make more sense. The difference between the results of the survey and the hours logged in Raptr’s playtime report could have something to do with the survey itself, which offered respondents a chance to win a high-end custom gaming PC. So you’d think that this would lead to more playtime logged for DICE’s big shooter. The survey paints a picture of a showdown between mainstream Hollywood-style blockbuster Modern Warfare 3 – and the more important and innovative Battlefield 3. 80% of respondents feel the Call of Duty franchise generates more hype through its marketing 58% of respondents said the Battlefield franchise has had a bigger impact on the FPS genre 92% of respondents consider DICE a more innovative developer than Infinity Ward

81% of respondents were more excited for the launch of Battlefield 3 For the first time ever for any franchise, three Call of Duty games were in the top 10 playtime charts on Raptr During the first week of launch, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 stole more playtime from Battlefield 3 than any other game 53% of Battlefield 3 players on Xbox 360 are also playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, compared to just 31% of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 players who also played Battlefield 3

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 accumulated more total hours played in one week post-launch than Battlefield 3 has in three weeks post-launch During each game’s first week of launch, Xbox 360 players logged 17% more per-user playtime in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, averaging 20.45 hours compared to 17.37 hours of Battlefield 3 Xbox 360 players logged 40% more launch-day playtime in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, averaging 6.19 hours compared to 4.45 hours of Battlefield 3 Here are the key findings from Raptr’s report on playtime tracking: Given how well received the game was, EA has a powerful opportunity to take things further next year, though it’s clear at this point that Call of Duty is a phenomenon that is unrivaled.” “EA made a valiant effort evangelizing its fan base and generating massive support around the launch of Battlefield 3. “The battle for dominance for the first-person shooter market in 2011 is clearly in Activision’s favor,” said Raptr CEO Dennis Fong. The statistics in Raptr’s latest report reveal that Xbox 360 players spent 40% more time playing Modern Warfare 3 on launch day than they did playing Battlefield 3 when it launched. But when you break down the numbers comparing hours played from Raptr’s user base of over 10 million gamers, it looks like most players prefer Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 to Battlefield 3. That data comes from a survey of over 6,000 respondents. According to opinion data from social networking service Raptr, more players were excited about the launch of Battlefield 3, thought that DICE was a more innovative developer than Infinity Ward, and that the Battlefield franchise has had a bigger impact on the FPS genre than Call of Duty.
